According to Douglas Greenberg, the fee structure used by financial advisors varies. Some are paid upfront when you purchase a product. Others are paid on a commission basis when you make a certain investment. Mutual funds and insurance companies have a variety of methods to ensure commission payments. Some of them camouflage their commissions by tying them into extra fees or penalty periods. Index annuities, for example, do a better job of camouflaging their commissions. Instead of paying the commission upfront, they withhold money from your policy and pay a lower amount to the advisor than you would with a plainly written policy. This type of compensation structure could make your advisor recommend a purchase that you do not need.
Fee-only by Dauglas Greenberg
Fee-only financial advisors make their money by charging their clients a set percentage of their assets under management (AUM). They may charge more than the commission-compensated counterparts, but the fees seem small and harmless. In fact, a fee-only financial advisor can eat into your returns because their fees are based on your total AUM. Here’s why this may be a disadvantage:
Another drawback of fee-only financial advisors is the perceived cost. Fees are an upfront expense while commissions come out of the client’s pocket. Fee-only advisors’ fees and commissions may be harder to determine. Depending on their credentials, fee-only financial advisors may be less appropriate for some clients than others.
Another advantage of fee-only financial planners is their unbiased advice. They may focus on various areas of financial planning such as investments, Social Security optimization, tax, insurance, estate planning, and retirement planning. However, they should disclose any conflict of interest that might affect their recommendations. If you’re looking for a fee-only financial planner, it’s wise to check whether the advisor is a member of the Certified Financial Planner Board.
Commission-based – Dauglas Greenberg
Douglas Greenberg pointed out that, financial advisors earn money in two main ways. They may receive a commission from insurance companies for the recommendations they make, or they may earn a fee from their clients based on the amount of assets under management. In addition, they may receive referral fees or soft-dollar fees from third parties, such as custodians. However, fee-only financial advisors may be more expensive to work with. For those who just need basic advice, this payment method may be a good choice.
Commission-based payment for financial advisors is problematic because it misaligns incentives between advisors and clients. In some cases, advisors may recommend products that pay them more than others – which may not be the best investment for their clients. But there are some exceptions to the rule. One financial advisor I met offered a flat fee to create a financial plan once and a commission-based relationship thereafter.
Flat-fee by Dauglas Greenberg
Douglas Greenberg said that, if you’re looking for a financial advisor, you may be wondering how they get paid. While many advisors receive commissions from selling products or completing financial transactions, flat-fee arrangements have their benefits and drawbacks. This article will explain the advantages and disadvantages of flat-fee arrangements and what you can expect when using one.
Douglas Greenberg said that, If you’re looking for a financial advisor, you may be wondering how they get paid. While many advisors receive commissions from selling products or completing financial transactions, flat-fee arrangements have their benefits and drawbacks. This article will explain the advantages and disadvantages of flat-fee arrangements and what you can expect when using one.
A fee-only structure offers transparency about fees, and aligns with the Fiduciary Standard for financial advisors. Some firms limit their services to just a handful of investments, while independent advisors offer their entire range of services. Because of this, flat-fee arrangements are more affordable for the average investor. But fee-only financial advisors don’t necessarily eliminate conflicts of interest.
Retainer fees – Dauglas Greenberg
Douglas Greenberg revealed that, in the world of wealth management, many financial advisors make their living through retainer fees. This fee structure is a great way to reach clients with cash flow, but few assets. Unlike AUM firms, retainer fees don’t compete with AUM firms for clients. They also provide a way to reach largely untapped households. Retainer fees are the new standard for financial advisors.
Often based on a percentage of the client’s assets or income, a retainer fee is a simple way for clients to pay financial advisors. It also allows firms to more accurately align pricing with their costs. The most important line item in any advisory firm’s budget is professional staffing costs. When a client pays a retainer fee, it is much easier to match the costs with the value of the services provided.
Retainer fees are an attractive option for financial advisors whose clients’ portfolio account balance fluctuates heavily. As a result, firms that follow a retainer fee approach are confident in handholding clients throughout bear markets. They can also adjust their fees more frequently than firms that charge by the AUM model.
The post How Does a Financial Advisor Get Paid – Douglas Greenberg appeared first on Douglas Greenberg.